Comments on: Oprah Winfrey Throws Women Under the Bus

By: Moose

Moose — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:31:30 +0000

I hope that women across this country boycot Oprah’s show and magazine. The left for too long has screamed that all news media outlets need to be fair and balanced. But, what they really mean is just outlets that are perceived to be right leaning. Until Oprah becomes fair and balanced, BOYCOTT OPRAH!!!

By: lonelyconservative

lonelyconservative — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:56:46 +0000

Nepa - that was a secret!

By: Under The Bus Go Oprah’s Followers « Quipster

Under The Bus Go Oprah’s Followers « Quipster — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:44:11 +0000

[...] American Sentinel makes a point through its post, “Oprah Winfrey Throws Women Under The Bus.” Granted it is unlikely Sarah Palin will be giving any interviews right now anyway, [...]

By: NEPAConservative

NEPAConservative — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:20:32 +0000

And the witch hunt continues…

TOM, it was 5 schools in 6 years. And Tom, anyone can be president…see Harry S Truman’s credentials. Arguably the best.

Nobody says you need to be a slimy life long politician / lawyer to be president. Like Barry.

And IF you want to chat experience…Barack has missed over 400 votes in the last 2 sessions. This also means that he’s probably missed a lot of those committee meetings that he claims as experience. I still don’t hold that against him.

You need to be American born and over 35. So that means Sarah IS qualified. PERIOD.

Lonely, stop it, you love Operah :)

By: lonelyconservative

lonelyconservative — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:09:17 +0000

Tom, you don’t seem to get it. Personally, I could not care less if Sarah Palin goes on the Oprah show. I simply pointed out that Oprah’s viewers asked for it, Oprah shot them down due to her own political agenda. Without her viewers she is nothing.

By: tom

tom — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:59:59 +0000

Most of the people resonding to Oprah running her own show and not have the lying, hypocritcal Sarah Palin on her show “consider her show lightweight entertainment.” So, if that is true why all the gnashing of the teeth. There are shows — in fact a whole network that would not know the truth if it walked up and slapped them in the face — out there that would be more conducive to what you are seeking - a free pass for the VP nom who went to 6 schools in 5 years .

By: marlon

marlon — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:29:01 +0000

PALIN doesnt need …oprah “the view” letterman -she just needs to speak on the campaign trail and her voice - ideas will be heard. the media disrespected her and she owes them nothing!

By: Mariah

Mariah — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:03:03 +0000

I have never watched a full episode of an Oprah Winfrey show, nor could I understand why someone as obnoxious, presumptuous, and boring as she is would be paid such an obscene amount of money. I have never understood the attraction. When Oprah Winfrey decided to publicly back Barack Obama she forfeited any objectivity she might have ever had. She will never again have the opportunity to interview (if that is what she does) anyone in the political arena who is not a Democrat. She has lost all credibility, she has no believability, she left it back at Invesco Field along with her false eyelashes. Sometime ago, while in line at the grocery store I realized that Oprah Winfrey is the only “cover girl” in her O magazine. Such conceit fits her egomaniacal personality. Nothing she will ever say or do will convince me that her backing of Barack Obama was not racially motivated. From her well publicized celebration of black women’s accomplishments, to using her influence to back Obama, Oprah Winfrey has flipped the finger at any non black who helped her meteoric rise. Were a non black entertainer to behave as she has the shouts of racism would be thunderous. Sarah Palin doesn’t need the likes of Oprah Winfrey. Governor Palin’s accomplishments are worthwhile and real.

By: nepaconservative

nepaconservative — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:42:23 +0000

The O rebutttllee:

“The item in today’s Drudge Report is categorically untrue,” Winfrey said in a statement sent to news organizations in reaction to the DrudgeReport.com posting. “There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over.”

Notice she says “after the campaign is over” she would love to have Palin as a guest. What a phoney !

By: nepaconservative

nepaconservative — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:37:12 +0000

I think the fact that she would have Tom Cruise on her show and not Sarah Palin speaks volumes about what this woman is really about.