Obama Foreign Policy: The ‘Grave Threat’ Of Naive Pretension
About the Author: The Party of Kennedy is NOT the Party of Pelosi. The Democratic Party has radically degenerated into a socialistic and postmodern perversion of its former place in American political thought. In place of Judeo-Christian values they embrace secular humanism; in place of a strong national defense they embrace a reliance upon internationalism; in place of a strong family they embrace a radical abortion agenda that increasingly includes outright infanticide.
I can't sit idly by and watch the culture war pass me by. It is time to choose sides. As Joshua 24:15 puts it, "choose this day whom you will serve."
Polls have shown that the more committed one is to (any) religious belief, the more conservative one tends to be politically. One’s views toward religion profoundly affect one’s commitment to political, social, and moral issues. In my articles, I seek to argue in favor of a religion-friendly view of culture, morality, and politics. Read more from this authorSeveral years ago, my young nephew believed that he was the most magnificent thing that ever happened.
He was Superman.
His family went from encouraging his self-esteem to trying to take him down a notch.
But for a while, there was no taking him down a notch. His sense of himself was so full that no failure or defeat could reach him. It didn’t matter if you caught him a thousand times, he still genuinely believed that he was faster than you.
That’s kind of where Barack Obama is, methinks.
He says that - unlike George Bush and the other candidates for president, he would pursue unconditional talks with leaders of rogue regimes. As time passed, Obama proceeded to tack on so many stipulations to his “precondition-free” talks that his policy was no different than anyone else’s.
But he still claimed his policy was better.
Obama said that Iran wasn’t a serious threat to the United States, but was forced as the sheer ridiculousness of his position was revealed to acknowledge that it was in fact “a grave threat.”
But he still maintained his position never changed, and he had been right along.
Obama said that Jerusalem must remain the undivided capital of Israel to Jewish groups, and then said to Palestinians that the issue of Jerusalem would be subject to negotiation.
But he maintained that his position was “no shift in policy.”
Obama opposed the surge strategy in Iraq, arguing it would lead to more sectarian violence and result in more American deaths. In the face of overwhelming evidence that he was wrong - with even al Qaeda acknowledging its defeat - Obama had his campaign scrub his worst criticisms from his website and began to “evolve” his position on Iraq without ever acknowledging that he had changed.
Barack Obama maintains that he “never has doubts about his foreign policy experience.” Never.
That’s why he can ignore the advice of General David Petraeus and other military experts. Just try convincing a pretentious child that you know better than he.
Nope. Obama is still the fastest, strongest, bestest boy in the whole wide world. And nothing - no matter how many times events prove him wrong - can shake that naive childish confidence.
My nephew got through this period, and is a terrific kid to be around. Obama has a very long way to go.
John Edwards - in the face of his caught-red handed act of adultery - said, “In the course of several campaigns, I started to believe that I was special and became increasingly egocentric and narcissistic.” I would submit that Barack Obama is FAR more egocentric and narcissistic than Edwards at this point.
The pattern continues merrily along: when Russia invaded Georgia, Barack Obama offered a neutral, insipid statement calling for both sides to restrain themselves. John McCain immediately issued a sharply-worded message that condemned the Russian invasion of a democratic government and ally. As the days, the war, and the death and destruction, dragged on, Obama began to issue increasing criticism of Russia (you know, like McCain had immediately done). McCain appeared prescient; Obama appeared ignorant.
Barack Obama was taken to school in foreign policy yet again. But like a pretentious child, he can’t see it or admit it. Hence his campaign came up with this beauty via a senior adviser:
Obama adviser Susan Rice, appearing on MSNBC’s “Hardball” Tuesday night, accused McCain of responding irresponsibly. “Barack Obama, the administration and the NATO allies took a measured, reasoned approach,” she said. “We were dealing with the facts as we knew them. John McCain shot from the hip, very aggressive, belligerent statement. He may or may not have complicated the situation.”
In other words, McCain should have taken “the nuanced” and “measured” initial position Obama did and call on Georgia to “restrain” itself as Russian tanks started rolling through its streets.
John McCain “shot from the hip” with a “very aggressive, belligerent statement” that “may (or may not) have complicated the situation”? When McCain’s assessment was right-on target and Obama’s was pathetically weak?
It’s really no different than that little arrogant punk kid who can’t admit he got beat claiming that his opponent somehow cheated.
America needs to take a long, hard look at Barack Obama and conclude that it needs an experienced adult to make good decisions - not a pretentious child who is pathologically incapable of dealing with his limitations and inadequacies.
- Invesco Field ‘Temple Of Barack’ Reveals Pathological Pretension
- Fearing An Obama-Kaine Ticket: The Foreign Policy Dynamic Duo
- Elitist Democrats Slam Palin and small town America
- Press Release, DNC: Statement by Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman in Response to John McCain’s Remarks to the NAACP
- McCain Democrats
Mrs. Rice, the one who called Mrs. Clinton a monster, is just saying that Obama did not have the facts, contradicting his false statement that he had dealt many times with SO, and that he “may or may not” have shot himself in the foot twice.
“America needs to take a long, hard look at Barack Obama and conclude that it needs an experienced adult to make good decisions - not a pretentious child who is pathologically incapable of dealing with his limitations and inadequacies.”
Agreed. But that means that the electorate itself needs to be composed of adults who have the experience and wisdom to see that the pretentious and pathological Obama actually is incapable of dealing with anything.
That means that lots of lots of people must mature VERY quickly before Election Day.
Obama is nothing more than an empty suit. That is all there is to him. And America is starting to wake up to that fact.
BA: Not that it particularly matters, but it was not Rice that called Clinton a monster. It was Samantha Power.
Presto,
Thanks for the correction. It didn’t sound like something Condileeza Rice (who is a classy lady though I don’t always trust her positions) would say.
It didn’t appear that BA had any ulterior motives, and just remembered wrong.
CKA says the real scary thing: we need a nation of mature voters rather than a nation of juveniles who want someone else to pay for their irresponsible actions. Which do we have???